<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advergaming: Sneak King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/</link>
	<description>Information: It's the Magic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: k7lim</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>k7lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 07:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>&lt;a class=&quot;imagelink&quot; href=&quot;http://localoaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/tony_the_tiger.jpg&quot; title=&quot;tony_the_tiger.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image61&quot; src=&quot;http://localoaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/tony_the_tiger.thumbnail.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;tony_the_tiger.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;you can see just how much more sophisticated advertisers have gotten.  check out old Tony the Tiger.  (Thanks to Daniela for the image)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="imagelink" href="http://localoaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/tony_the_tiger.jpg" title="tony_the_tiger.jpg" rel="nofollow"><img id="image61" src="http://localoaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/tony_the_tiger.thumbnail.jpg" alt="tony_the_tiger.jpg" /></a>you can see just how much more sophisticated advertisers have gotten.  check out old Tony the Tiger.  (Thanks to Daniela for the image)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil opportunistic spam: advancing even on the snailmail front, not forsaking the highly-educated at Localoaf</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>evil opportunistic spam: advancing even on the snailmail front, not forsaking the highly-educated at Localoaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Is there a way to &#8220;opt-out&#8221; of those annoying mailers that come basically EVERY DAY? Like a do-not-call list? Or can I call the distributing companies to take me off their list? A lot of the trash I get isn&#8217;t aimed or addressed for me. However, when it IS, and when it WORKS, even for 2 distressing seconds, I get peeved. I hate getting in anything that feels like an arms race. But as consumers (I actually hate when &#8220;human&#8221; is replaced with &#8220;consumer&#8221;), we have to keep up, increasing our skepticism, and maybe protecting our children    Tags: annoying, college, debt, information facets, mail, scam, snail mail, student loans, warning, whining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is there a way to &#8220;opt-out&#8221; of those annoying mailers that come basically EVERY DAY? Like a do-not-call list? Or can I call the distributing companies to take me off their list? A lot of the trash I get isn&#8217;t aimed or addressed for me. However, when it IS, and when it WORKS, even for 2 distressing seconds, I get peeved. I hate getting in anything that feels like an arms race. But as consumers (I actually hate when &#8220;human&#8221; is replaced with &#8220;consumer&#8221;), we have to keep up, increasing our skepticism, and maybe protecting our children    Tags: annoying, college, debt, information facets, mail, scam, snail mail, student loans, warning, whining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken-ichi</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken-ichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Are six-year-olds the target demographic for Sneak King?  I feel like The King in general targets people capable of appreicating irony.  If I were six I think I&#039;d find him terrifying.  But then again, I&#039;m not six.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are six-year-olds the target demographic for Sneak King?  I feel like The King in general targets people capable of appreicating irony.  If I were six I think I&#8217;d find him terrifying.  But then again, I&#8217;m not six.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k7lim</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>k7lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Ken-ichi, I don&#039;t disagree with anything you&#039;re saying.  But the key word in your point is &quot;we,&quot; as in you and me and other highly-educated adults.  Surely the curators of a fine blog, such as this one, possess the media literacy and critical thinking to see the workings of Sneak King.  

However, I&#039;m getting at the basis of why the Joe Camel campaign was condemned in court.  Surely a 2-D image shown at the corner of a 7-11 seems harmless, given the sophistication of current persuasive messages.  But the cognitive abilities of a 6-year-old have not scaled.  Prior to a certain age, children lack the ability to put themselves in someone else&#039;s shoes.  A child simply cannot feel that skepticism towards persuasive message.  And that&#039;s a good thing (imagine kids at recess having cynical discussions about political advertisements).  Except when a corn-syrup pusher is using advanced mind tricks on that child.  

The hottest front in combating obesity has always been our children. 

I remember begging to go to Pizza Hut because they had those awesome &quot;Land Before Time&quot; puppets.  The fact that the pizza was deliciously greasy didn&#039;t hurt things.  

Then comes the reality that one of the most powerful commercial forces is the nagging child.  Toy packaging allows children to grasp and play with the toys at the store, even as the child is sitting in the shopping-cart-seat.  Sugary cereals vie for the shelf position right at kids&#039; eye level.  Hell, there have been times that I&#039;VE been tempted to buy someone else&#039;s kid a toy, just so the kid would pipe down.  

So combine the inability of a child to resist the wonders and joys of a video game, with the inability of an adult to hush that child.  And you get significantly more trips to BK than if you had never introduced the game.  Consequently, you get more teenagers and adults who love triple whoppers in the coming decades.  

Does that scare you at all?  Or am I being &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=tpUt83DDrsI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paranoid&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken-ichi, I don&#8217;t disagree with anything you&#8217;re saying.  But the key word in your point is &#8220;we,&#8221; as in you and me and other highly-educated adults.  Surely the curators of a fine blog, such as this one, possess the media literacy and critical thinking to see the workings of Sneak King.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m getting at the basis of why the Joe Camel campaign was condemned in court.  Surely a 2-D image shown at the corner of a 7-11 seems harmless, given the sophistication of current persuasive messages.  But the cognitive abilities of a 6-year-old have not scaled.  Prior to a certain age, children lack the ability to put themselves in someone else&#8217;s shoes.  A child simply cannot feel that skepticism towards persuasive message.  And that&#8217;s a good thing (imagine kids at recess having cynical discussions about political advertisements).  Except when a corn-syrup pusher is using advanced mind tricks on that child.  </p>
<p>The hottest front in combating obesity has always been our children. </p>
<p>I remember begging to go to Pizza Hut because they had those awesome &#8220;Land Before Time&#8221; puppets.  The fact that the pizza was deliciously greasy didn&#8217;t hurt things.  </p>
<p>Then comes the reality that one of the most powerful commercial forces is the nagging child.  Toy packaging allows children to grasp and play with the toys at the store, even as the child is sitting in the shopping-cart-seat.  Sugary cereals vie for the shelf position right at kids&#8217; eye level.  Hell, there have been times that I&#8217;VE been tempted to buy someone else&#8217;s kid a toy, just so the kid would pipe down.  </p>
<p>So combine the inability of a child to resist the wonders and joys of a video game, with the inability of an adult to hush that child.  And you get significantly more trips to BK than if you had never introduced the game.  Consequently, you get more teenagers and adults who love triple whoppers in the coming decades.  </p>
<p>Does that scare you at all?  Or am I being <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=tpUt83DDrsI" rel="nofollow">paranoid</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken-ichi</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken-ichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2006/11/25/advergaming-sneak-king/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s matter of atrophying critical thinking skills.  Sneak King seems like a game someone might have made to mock aggressive advertising practices, and by releasing it, BK is (ingeniously) parsing the absurdity from the message in this form of satire.  I think we&#039;ve become so saturated in satire that we love it for it&#039;s own sake, regardless of its message or the identity of the messenger.  We know BK is trying to manipulate us with this kind of advertising, but we don&#039;t care, because it&#039;s funny, and it only costs $4.  

If Fox News fielded someone as witty and biting as Stewart or Colbert, would apolitical 18-35-year-olds watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s matter of atrophying critical thinking skills.  Sneak King seems like a game someone might have made to mock aggressive advertising practices, and by releasing it, BK is (ingeniously) parsing the absurdity from the message in this form of satire.  I think we&#8217;ve become so saturated in satire that we love it for it&#8217;s own sake, regardless of its message or the identity of the messenger.  We know BK is trying to manipulate us with this kind of advertising, but we don&#8217;t care, because it&#8217;s funny, and it only costs $4.  </p>
<p>If Fox News fielded someone as witty and biting as Stewart or Colbert, would apolitical 18-35-year-olds watch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

