<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another plan to save the newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.localoaf.org/2009/02/16/yet-another-plan-to-save-the-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2009/02/16/yet-another-plan-to-save-the-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Information: It's the Magic</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samuel A. Falvo II</title>
		<link>http://www.localoaf.org/2009/02/16/yet-another-plan-to-save-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-9375</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel A. Falvo II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localoaf.org/2009/02/16/yet-another-plan-to-save-the-newspapers/#comment-9375</guid>
		<description>The solution to the voracious linkers becoming voracious plagiarizers problem is the use of another online service called Attributor (http://www.attributor.com).  I'm not affiliated with Attributor anymore, but last year, I used to work for them.  Their "text" product is just the ticket to detect when content is being copied without your knowledge, and they offer an automated mechanism to contact offenders with link proposals, revenue sharing agreements, or even DMCA take-down notices if you're bloodthirsty enough.  All in all, I think the combination of Kachingle and Attributor systems will prove a useful combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution to the voracious linkers becoming voracious plagiarizers problem is the use of another online service called Attributor (http://www.attributor.com).  I&#8217;m not affiliated with Attributor anymore, but last year, I used to work for them.  Their &#8220;text&#8221; product is just the ticket to detect when content is being copied without your knowledge, and they offer an automated mechanism to contact offenders with link proposals, revenue sharing agreements, or even DMCA take-down notices if you&#8217;re bloodthirsty enough.  All in all, I think the combination of Kachingle and Attributor systems will prove a useful combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
